Key takeaways:
Stevia is a natural, no-calorie sweetener made from the stevia plant. The stevia leaf extract that’s available in most grocery and food stores is considered safe.
Stevia is similar to other artificial sweeteners in that it doesn’t have calories or sugar. But based on research so far, it’s associated with fewer health risks.
Some stevia products contain other fillers and ingredients that you may be trying to avoid. So, always be sure to read the packaging.
There are many options to sweeten your food and drinks if you’re trying to avoid regular table sugar. And these different types of sweeteners are becoming more popular. If you’re looking for a no-calorie sweetener that’s more natural compared to other artificial sweeteners, stevia might be a good option for you. Here, we compare stevia to table sugar and other sweeteners, and discuss its potential risks and benefits when it comes to your health.
Stevia is a natural sweetener that’s derived from a plant. Sometimes called Stevia rebaudiana, the plant is a member of the sunflower (Asteraceae) family.
The term “stevia” may be used to describe the sweetener in different forms. But this can be confusing because there’s some overlap in the terminology. Here are some common forms:
High-purity stevia leaf extract: This is what you’ll find sold in grocery stores. This is also the only form of stevia used in processed foods and drinks. High-purity stevia leaf extract contains 95% of steviol glycosides, the natural compounds present in the plant’s leaf. The most common steviol glycosides are rebaudioside A (Reb-A) and stevioside.
Whole plant or “raw” stevia: This is also known as Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. This form of stevia isn’t approved for use in the U.S., as the ingredients are not regulated and may be unsafe.
Stevia extract: This is made from steeping the leaves of the plant in water to extract the sweet compounds into the liquid. Stevia extract isn’t purified.
A quick note to clarify that the word “stevia” throughout the rest of this article will refer to high-purity stevia leaf extract. This is the version of stevia that most people are familiar with.
Are artificial sweeteners harmful? Stevia may be safer than other no-calorie sweeteners, which are associated with health risks.
Aspartame and cancer: This has been an ongoing source of controversy. But there’s no clear evidence that aspartame leads to cancer in humans.
Stevia and blood sugar: Pure stevia does not raise blood sugar. But some stevia products have other ingredients that can be harmful for people with diabetes.
Stevia is generally considered a safe food product. Consuming it in moderation doesn’t pose significant health risks. But sometimes stevia is sold with other additives or sugar alcohols to increase its bulk and sweetness. In these cases, there can be some risks to your health including:
Increased blood sugar: If stevia is combined with additives like maltodextrin and dextrose, it may raise a person’s blood sugar. This is especially important for people with health conditions like diabetes.
Increased risk of heart attack and stroke: Sometimes stevia is combined with erythritol, a sugar alcohol that has been linked to an increase in heart attack and stroke.
Digestive issues: Sometimes other sugar alcohols like xylitol are added to stevia. These have been shown to cause upset stomach and diarrhea. And some studies suggest that stevia alone (without sugar alcohols) can impact the healthy bacteria naturally found in a person’s gut.
This is why it’s important to check the package before assuming you’re consuming pure stevia. But overall, consuming stevia in moderation is unlikely to cause harm.
Save over 40% on Qsymia with GoodRx
Discover the once daily Qsymia for weight management. Qsymia is for adults and children 12-17 in combination with a healthy diet and regular exercise.
Although more research is needed to understand stevia’s long-term effects, some studies have shown potential health benefits. Consuming stevia may play a helpful role in the following health conditions.
Stevia may protect against nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). But most of the research has been done in animals. So, it’s too early to know if this same benefit applies to humans.
One study showed that when people with diabetes drank tea sweetened with stevia, it didn’t raise their blood sugar levels or change their hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) levels. So, stevia may be a good sugar substitute for people trying to manage their blood sugar.
People who took 500 mg of stevia powder daily for 2 years experienced a decrease in blood pressure. The decrease in the systolic (top number) was by about 10 mmHg. And for the diastolic (bottom number), there was a decrease of about 6 mmHg. A larger review of several studies showed a small effect on lowering the diastolic blood pressure number, but not the systolic number.
A study looked at people with early-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) who took 250 mg of stevia daily. After 9 months, they saw improved levels of certain blood markers that reflected improved kidney function. (Usually these markers rise as kidney disease worsens.)
Many people are familiar with the way artificial sweeteners have been linked to cancer — but this hasn’t included stevia. (Several studies have since shown that there’s likely no link between artificial sweeteners and cancer.) When it comes to stevia, test tube and animal studies have shown that it may stop the growth of cancer cells. But without further studies, it’s too early to tell if this is true in humans.
When it comes to taste, stevia is up to 400 times sweeter than standard table sugar. And when it comes to health, stevia may be a better option. Table sugar has been linked to inflammation and other health conditions like increased body fat.
Using stevia won’t make you crave sugar or feel hungrier. One study found that consuming stevia doesn’t lead to increased appetite or a decrease in feelings of fullness.
But you may be wondering how stevia compares to these other artificial sweeteners, which are also low in calories:
The key difference between stevia and these other sweeteners is that stevia comes from a plant. Artificial sweeteners, on the other hand, are all developed by modifying the sugar molecule.
Below is a table highlighting the key differences between them.
Sweetener | Sweetness (compared to table sugar) | Calories (per packet) | Health risks |
Stevia | 200-400 times sweeter | 0 | No significant health risks |
Aspartame | 200 times sweeter | 3.65 | Limited evidence linking it to cancer Increased risk of heart disease Increased body fat May be associated with changes in brain function Dangerous for people with phenylketonuria (PKU) |
Saccharin | 200-700 times sweeter | 3.6 | Increased body fat May damage liver and kidneys May be harmful to healthy gut bacteria |
Sucralose | 600 times sweeter | 3.36 | Increased risk of heart disease May be harmful to healthy gut bacteria |
It’s still unclear how artificial sweeteners affect long-term health. But so far, stevia appears to be safer.
Compared to table sugar, stevia is a good alternative since it doesn’t contain any sugar and is calorie-free. It’s generally considered safe to consume, just like other artificial sweeteners. There may also be health benefits of using stevia related to heart, liver, and kidney health. Always be sure to check the package to see if there are other ingredients or fillers added to the stevia product, as you may want to avoid certain additives.
Ajami, M., et al. (2020). Effects of stevia on glycemic and lipid profile of type 2 diabetic patients: A randomized controlled trial. Avicenna journal of phytomedicine.
American Cancer Society. (2023). Aspartame and cancer risk.
Anton, S. D., et al. (2010). Effects of stevia, aspartame, and sucrose on food intake, satiety, and postprandial glucose and insulin levels. Appetite.
Ashwell, M. (2015). Stevia, nature’s zero-calorie sustainable sweetener: A new player in the fight against obesity. Nutrition Today.
Azeez, O. H., et al. (2019). Long-term saccharin consumption and increased risk of obesity, diabetes, hepatic dysfunction, and renal impairment in rats. Medicina.
Choudhary, A. K., et al. (2018). Neurophysiological symptoms and aspartame: What is the connection? Nutritional Neuroscience.
Debras, C., et al. (2022). Artificial sweeteners and risk of cardiovascular diseases: Results from the prospective NutriNet-Santé cohort. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.).
Del Pozo, S., et al. (2022). Potential effects of sucralose and saccharin on gut microbiota: A review. Nutrients.
Faruque, S., et al. (2019). The dose makes the poison: Sugar and obesity in the United States - a review. Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences.
Figlewicz, D. P., et al. (2009). Effect of moderate intake of sweeteners on metabolic health in the rat. Physiology & Behavior.
FoodData Central. (2019). Sweeteners, tabletop, aspartame, Equal, packets. U.S. Department of Agriculture.
FoodData Central. (2019). Sweeteners, tabletop, saccharin (sodium saccharin). U.S. Department of Agriculture.
FoodData Central. (2019). Sweeteners, tabletop, sucralose, Splenda packets. U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Ghusn, W., et al. (2023). The impact of artificial sweeteners on human health and cancer association: A comprehensive clinical review. Cureus.
Hsieh, M. H., et al. (2003). Efficacy and tolerability of oral stevioside in patients with mild essential hypertension: A two-year, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Clinical Therapeutics.
Iatridis, N., et al. (2022). Anti-cancer properties of Stevia rebaudiana; More than a sweetener. Molecules.
Kakleas, K., et al. (2020). Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, insulin resistance, and sweeteners: A literature review. Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism.
Mäkinen, K. K. (2016). Gastrointestinal disturbances associated with the consumption of sugar alcohols with special consideration of xylitol: Scientific review and instructions for dentists and other health-care professionals. International Journal of Dentistry.
National Cancer Institute. (2023). Artificial sweeteners and cancer.
Onakpoya, I. J., et al. (2015). Effect of the natural sweetener, steviol glycoside, on cardiovascular risk factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology.
Perrier, J. D., et al. (2018). FDA regulatory approach to steviol glycosides. Food and Chemical Toxicology.
Peteliuk, V., et al. (2021). Natural sweetener Stevia rebaudiana: Functionalities, health benefits and potential risks. EXCLI Journal.
Risdon, S., et al. (2021). Sucralose and cardiometabolic health: Current understanding from receptors to clinical investigations. Advances in Nutrition.
Rizwan, F., et al. (2018). Preliminary analysis of the effect of Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana) in patients with chronic kidney disease (stage I to stage III). Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications.
Ruiz-Ojeda, F. J., et al. (2019). Effects of sweeteners on the gut microbiota: A review of experimental studies and clinical trials. Advances in Nutrition.
Steffen, B. T., et al. (2023). Long-term aspartame and saccharin intakes are related to greater volumes of visceral, intermuscular, and subcutaneous adipose tissue: The CARDIA study. International Journal of Obesity.
Toyoda, K., et al. (2022). Assessment of the carcinogenicity of stevioside in F344 rats. Food and Chemical Toxicology.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2023). Aspartame and other sweeteners in food.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2023). Import alert 45-06: Detention without physical examination of Stevia leaves, crude extracts of Stevia leaves and foods containing Stevia leaves and/or Stevia extracts.
Witkowski, M., et al. (2023). The artificial sweetener erythritol and cardiovascular event risk. Nature Medicine.