Key takeaways:
Rolfing uses soft tissue therapy and posture education to correct imbalances and realign the body.
Minimal evidence suggests that Rolfing may relieve muscle and fascia (connective tissue) pain. But more extensive research is needed to determine its effectiveness.
Rolfing is safe for most people to try. But some, including those with blood clots or nerve injuries, may want to avoid it.
When you hear the term Rolfing, you may not think of manual therapy. But that's exactly what it is. The alternative treatment includes soft tissue therapy and movement (posture education).
Biochemist Dr. Ida P. Rolf developed the Rolfing method more than 50 years ago. It targets fascia, or connective tissue, which may play a role in musculoskeletal problems. Rolfing aims to improve pain, posture, and movement.
But does it really work? Find out what the science says and if Rolfing is right for you.
Rolfing combines a unique form of manual therapy with posture education to improve movement and flexibility. Dr. Rolf developed this complementary approach based on her belief that the body is a system of integrated structures or connective tissues. Rolf was trained as a biochemist and later explored various alternatives to chronic pain.
Connective tissues surround bones, muscles, nerves, and organs. And according to Rolf, these structures work together for optimal health and functioning. Imbalances in connective tissue cause pain and movement or posture problems.
Rolfing uses manual therapy to target the fascia. Rolf believed that doing so helps other body parts work together, restoring balance and alignment throughout the body. Proponents think this may help with physical functioning as well as psychological outlook.
Rolfing, or structural integration, uses two main techniques for therapy sessions:
Soft tissue massage: Rolfing therapists apply deep pressure with their fingertips, knuckles, or fists to loosen fascia. This type of therapeutic touch is intended to relieve tension, ease pain, and improve flexibility. But it should not be confused with deep tissue massage, which focuses on muscle and fascia. Rolfing targets areas throughout the body, not just problem areas. It is designed to improve whole-body function rather than specific symptoms like pain.
Sensorimotor education: Sensorimotor education is another fundamental part of rolfing. Rolf believed that gravity stresses the body. People may also learn postural exercises during Rolfing sessions. These and other methods are used to increase body awareness, improve movement patterns, and reduce strain on the body.
There's a need for large, high-quality studies on the benefits of Rolfing. That doesn't mean that Rolfing is ineffective. But it does mean that much of the existing evidence is limited or inconclusive. Let's see what science says about some of the supposed benefits of Rolfing.
Rolfing may ease chronic back pain. Chronic low back pain may be due in part to connective tissue dysfunction. These connective tissue problems can cause mobility issues or make back pain worse. The Dr. Ida Rolf Institute reports that many people with chronic back pain have benefited from Rolfing. But current research doesn't support this claim. A small trial found that Rolfing may reduce disability from back pain. But researchers note the need for more definitive studies.
Rolfing may relieve tension in muscles and fascia. The alternative therapy may release tension in muscles and connective tissue. Small studies show that Rolfing can improve neck pain, tension, and range of motion.
Rolfing may improve posture, balance, and movement. One of the goals of Rolfing is to improve posture and the body's relationship with gravity. It also aims to increase balance and movement. Surprisingly, these benefits are not well-documented.
Rolfing may increase energy levels. Structural integration has been linked to increased energy levels. The idea is that Rolfing helps muscles work more efficiently, which conserves energy. There is not enough evidence to support this claim.
Rolfing may calm the nervous system. According to researchers, Rolfing could have another positive effect: calming the nervous system. Experts think this benefit might also improve how people perceive and cope with pain.
According to the Dr. Ida Rolf Institute, Rolfing may be a little uncomfortable. But you should let your therapist know if you feel any pain.
The National Institutes of Health reports that massage therapy is generally safe. There are reported side effects, but they’re rare. Rolfing involves more than massage therapy. But the two approaches may have similar risks.
Everyone should talk to a healthcare provider before trying alternatives like Rolfing. And people with the following health concerns may want to avoid it altogether:
Skin burns or infections like cellulitis
An active tumor
Nerve problems
Musculoskeletal injuries or conditions
Sensitivity or discomfort from physical touch
Typically, certified Rolfing practitioners provide you with 10 one-hour sessions. Those sessions may include some combination of soft tissue massage and movement. The standard “Ten-Series” approach is divided into three categories. Here's what you can expect:
Sessions 1 to 3: The opening or “sleeve” sessions focus on loosening superficial connective tissue in the upper and lower body. In the first session, your therapist will also target your arms, ribs, torso, and diaphragm to improve your breathing.
Sessions 4 to 7: These “core” sessions target areas from the bottom of the pelvis to the top of the head as well as the legs.
Sessions 8 to 10: The final integration sessions incorporate movement to improve function and coordination.
Rolfing is a type of manual therapy that may help improve musculoskeletal pain. But experts are unclear on the science behind Rolfing and its effectiveness. And current evidence –– from individual cases and small studies –– is very limited.
That said, Rolfing is safe for most people. Your healthcare provider can help determine if this therapeutic approach is right for you.
Ajimsha, M. S., et al. (2020). Role of fascial connectivity in musculoskeletal dysfunctions: A narrative review. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies.
Cottingham, J. T., et al. (1988). Effects of soft tissue mobilization (rolfing pelvic lift) on parasympathetic tone in two age groups. Physical Therapy.
Dr. Ida Rolf Institute. (n.d.). Rolfing FAQ.
Dr. Ida Rolf Institute. (n.d.). What is rolfing?
Jacobson, E. (2011). Structural integration, an alternative method of manual therapy and sensorimotor education. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine.
Jacobson, E. (2011). Structural integration: Origins and development. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine.
Jacobson, E. E., et al. (2015). Structural integration as an adjunct to outpatient rehabilitation for chronic nonspecific low back pain: A randomized pilot clinical trial. Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine: eCAM.
James, H., et al. (2009). Rolfing structural integration treatment of cervical spine dysfunction. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies.
Koren, Y., et al. (2018). Deep tissue massage: What are we talking about?Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies.
Langevin, H. M., et al. (2006). Pathophysiological model for chronic low back pain integrating connective tissue and nervous system mechanisms. Medical Hypotheses.
Lee, K., et al. (2017). Comparison of treatment effects between rolfing and Swedish massage for cervical myofascial pain syndrome. Journal of International Academy of Physical Therapy Research.
Marcus, O. (2015). Meta mind of rolfing SI. Structural Integration.
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. (2019). Massage therapy: What you need to know.
Panjabi, M. M. (2006). A hypothesis of chronic back pain: Ligament subfailure injuries lead to muscle control dysfunction. European Spine Journal.
Shah, S., et al. (2013). Comparative effectiveness of active release technique and rolfing soft tissue manipulation in normal subjects with hamstring tightness - a randomised clinical trial. Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy.
Vickers, A., et al. (1999). Massage therapies. British Medical Journal.