Skip to main content
Affordable Care Act (ACA)

What Is the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Individual Mandate?

Tamara E. Holmes
Written by Tamara E. Holmes
Updated on March 25, 2026

Key takeaways:

  • The Affordable Care Act (ACA) had an individual mandate. It required consumers nationwide to have health insurance coverage or pay a penalty.

  • Advocates argued that the mandate helped control health insurance costs. Opponents said consumers should not face consequences if they choose not to buy insurance.

  • Congress voted to remove the ACA individual mandate in 2017. Since then, some states have enacted their own mandates, but not all of them carry a financial penalty.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) is the sweeping health-reform law enacted in 2010.

One of the most controversial aspects of the ACA was the individual mandate. The requirement aimed to encourage people in the U.S. to maintain health insurance coverage. As a result, most people who were not signed up for health insurance faced a financial penalty. The mandate was criticized by those who felt buying health insurance should be a personal choice.

Why was the individual mandate included in the ACA?

The individual mandate was a provision within the ACA. It required individuals to buy “minimum essential coverage” or face a tax penalty, unless they were eligible for an exemption.

Mandate supporters argued that a penalty would increase the number of insured people. They also said the mandate would help control costs because a larger pool of younger and healthier customers would offset the healthcare system’s expenses for those who were older and had more healthcare expenses. Mandate opponents argued that no one should be forced to buy health insurance.

What were the requirements for the ACA individual mandate?

The individual mandate required adults and their dependents to have health insurance. Specifically, they were required to have minimum essential coverage. The types of coverage that met this requirement were:

How much was the financial penalty for not having individual health insurance?

When it was enacted, the ACA gave people the opportunity to adjust to the mandate. The penalty began in 2014, when the first ACA plans were effective, and the amount increased over time. The penalty was calculated as the greater of the following:

  • A percentage of the household’s applicable income: The percentage was 1% in 2014, 2% in 2015, and 2.5% after that.

  • A flat dollar amount for each taxpayer and each dependent in a household. The amount was $95 in 2014, $325 in 2015, and $695 after that. The amount was half for dependents under 18. A household’s penalty was capped at 300% of the annual flat dollar amount.

The penalty also could not be higher than the national average premium for bronze plans offered through the ACA marketplace at the time.

Is the ACA individual mandate still in effect nationwide?

No, the ACA individual mandate is no longer in effect. The public had been divided about the individual mandate and penalty. A 2017 report by the Urban Institute’s Health Policy Center found that 39.3% of adults ages 18 to 64 surveyed wanted to repeal the individual mandate. By comparison, 29.6% wanted to keep it and 30.5% were undecided.

The mandate was particularly unpopular among Republicans. In 2017, a Republican-led Congress eliminated the penalty (effective in 2019) for people without health insurance. This was included in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

Is the ACA individual mandate still in effect in some states?

The ACA individual mandate is no longer in effect. But certain states apply their own health insurance mandates, some with financial penalties. Residents of California, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and Washington, D.C., must buy health insurance or face a penalty, unless they have an exemption.

Maryland and Vermont require residents to report their health insurance status. But they do not have a financial penalty for being uninsured.

How much is the penalty in states with a healthcare mandate?

Each state with a health insurance mandate has its own process for calculating the penalty for not having coverage. Some states with mandates have no penalty.

In California, the amount varies annually. For the 2025 tax year, the penalty was at least $950 per adult and $475 per dependent in a household. Residents can use the state’s Individual Shared Responsibility Penalty Estimator to determine the potential amount owed for the current tax year.

In Massachusetts, the healthcare mandate doesn’t apply to anyone under age 18. It also doesn’t apply to people with a qualified hardship or an exemption and to those whose incomes are equal to or less than 150% of the federal poverty level (FPL). The penalty is assessed on a sliding scale. For the 2025 tax year, individuals without insurance must pay:

  • $300 per year if they earn 150.1% to 200% of the FPL

  • $588 per year if they earn 200.1% to 250% of the FPL

  • $876 per year if they earn 250.1% to 300% of the FPL

  • $1,356 per year if they earn 300.1% to 400% of the FPL

  • $1,584 per year if they earn 400.1% to 500% of the FPL

  • $2,244 per year if they earn above 500% of the FPL

In New Jersey, the penalty is assessed based on how many months people in the household did not have coverage or an exemption. For the 2025 tax year, the amount ranges from $695 to $4,908 for an individual taxpayer. It increases based on the number of additional uninsured people in the household as well as household income.

In Rhode Island, the penalty is whichever of these amounts is greater:

  • 2.5% of annual household income

  • $695 per adult and $347.50 per dependent under 18

In Washington, D.C., the penalty for the 2025 tax year is the greater of:

  • 2.5% of annual household income over the federal tax-filing threshold

  • $795 per adult and $397.50 per dependent under 18, with a cap of $2,385 per family

States that require health coverage information

In Vermont, there is no financial penalty. But residents must report whether they have health insurance when they file their state taxes. Similarly, Maryland asks residents about health insurance status when they file taxes as an avenue to enrollment through the Maryland Health Connection.

Why do some states still mandate healthcare coverage?

According to a report by USC-Brookings Schaeffer Initiative for Health Policy, some states still mandate health insurance coverage in an attempt to reduce costs for everybody. The argument is that healthy people buying coverage offsets costs for less-healthy people.

States also mandate coverage to ensure health insurance policies meet certain standards and to increase revenue.

Reporting mandates as a path to health insurance coverage

Most states don’t mandate coverage. But some use creative ways to entice residents to buy health insurance. Maryland asks residents about their health insurance status on state tax forms. Then the state notifies residents if they are eligible for Medicaid or subsidized coverage from the state’s health insurance marketplace.

What is the employer mandate, and how is it different from the Obamacare individual mandate?

The ACA individual mandate required persons in the U.S. to have health insurance. The employer mandate is the part of the ACA that requires businesses of a certain size to offer their employees health insurance. Employers with 50 or more full-time employees must offer minimum essential coverage to 95% of their full-time staff or pay a penalty. The ACAs individual mandate has ended, but the employer mandate is still in effect.

The bottom line

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) individual mandate encouraged consumers to have health insurance by imposing a financial penalty if they did not have coverage or an exemption. Congress removed the ACA individual mandate as of 2019. But some states have their own healthcare mandates that impose financial penalties. Other states ask about insurance status on state tax filings but do not impose a penalty. This information is used to help uninsured residents who qualify find subsidized ACA marketplace coverage or Medicaid.

why trust our exports reliability shield

Why trust our experts?

Tamara E. Holmes
Written by:
Tamara E. Holmes
Tamara E. Holmes is a Washington, DC-based freelance journalist and content strategist who has been writing about personal finance, health, and health insurance for more than a decade. Her work has appeared in various print and online publications, such as USA Today, AARP, Working Mother, and Diversity Woman.
Cindy George, MPH, is the senior personal finance editor at GoodRx. She is an endlessly curious health journalist and digital storyteller.

References

GoodRx Health has strict sourcing policies and relies on primary sources such as medical organizations, governmental agencies, academic institutions, and peer-reviewed scientific journals. Learn more about how we ensure our content is accurate, thorough, and unbiased by reading our editorial guidelines.

Was this page helpful?

Latest articles